Contrast vernacular architecture with high-style design, and provide a concrete example of each.

• A. Vernacular uses local materials and building traditions for everyday use (e.g., a thatch-roof cottage); high-style follows formal vocabularies and innovations (e.g., Le Corbusier's Villa Savoye).
• B. Vernacular emphasizes monumental forms and universal symbolism; high-style emphasizes simple local materials.
• C. Vernacular is always constructed with brick; high-style relies on glass façades exclusively.
• D. Vernacular and high-style are interchangeable terms describing the same design approach.

Answer: (A)

Vernacular vs high-style is about how buildings arise from local needs, materials, and craft versus how architects articulate a formal language and push design ideas. Vernacular uses local materials and building traditions for everyday use; a thatch-roof cottage is a concrete example, showing how available resources and regional methods shape the form for daily living. High-style follows formal vocabularies and innovations, aiming for a more universal architectural language; Le Corbusier's Villa Savoye is a quintessential example, with its restrained geometry, pilotis, open plan, and emphasis on modernist principles. The other statements don’t fit because vernacular isn’t defined by monumental forms or universal symbolism, high-style isn’t limited to glass façades or brick-only constructions, and the terms are not interchangeable.