Which statement correctly distinguishes form follows function from function follows form and includes appropriate examples?

• A. Form follows function asserts that a building's shape derives from its purpose (e.g., a factory).
• B. Form follows function suggests the design's aesthetic or symbolic intent drives spatial layout (e.g., an iconic museum whose form expresses ideas rather than pure utility).
• C. The two concepts are identical in meaning.
• D. Function follows form asserts that a building's shape derives from its purpose.

Answer: (A)

Form follows function means a building’s shape comes from what it needs to do. A factory is a clear example: the design prioritizes large, uncluttered interior space for machinery, easy movement of goods, and durable construction, so the exterior form is simple and utilitarian rather than decorative. This shows how the function—the work the building must perform—drives the form.

The other ideas misplace the influence. Saying form follows function means the design’s aesthetic or symbolic aims control the layout would swap the focus to appearance or meaning rather than utility. Claiming the two concepts are identical ignores the directional relationship, and saying function follows form reverses the order by implying the shape dictates how the building will work.